Presidential Politics and Poker

Hello Rocky,
I read much about your American "Special Interest Groups." Are they all bad?
Alberto Moravia
Piazza del Popolo
Rome, Italy
Rocky Responds:
No Alberto, not all. The most pernicious are the pious blowhards who fight to regulate other people's behavior. They force good folks to band together in noble opposition. An example of a "good" special interest group, and one that the entire HelloRocky Team has joined, is the Poker Players Alliance (PPA), an organization dedicated to preserving the individuals right to the pursuit of happiness via internet poker.
The PPA recently sent its members summaries of the remaining presidential candidates views on internet gambling:
"Hillary Clinton:
The two-term senator from New York won the New Hampshire Democratic primary. She has recently expressed that she supports the industry’s position: to study Internet gambling to see whether it can be fairly regulated so that individuals can safely participate in it and American businesses can compete in the international market (Las Vegas Sun, 01/18/08).
Barack Obama:
The senator is from Illinois and winner of the Iowa Democratic caucus. Obama has recently expressed that he worries that the Internet is "a Wild West of illegal activity", and supports a study of Internet gambling and supports regulation to address the worst abuses (Las Vegas Sun, 01/18/08). He is reputed to be a good player, and doesn't mind letting it be known that he enjoys playing poker for money. These stories are even on his own website.
Mike Huckabee:
Republican Iowa caucus winner and former Arkansas governor, Mike Huckabee does have a clear position OPPOSING Internet Poker. Mike Huckabee responded to the National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling's questionnaire (the only candidate to respond, by the way). In it, he promised to veto any legislation repealing UIGEA or otherwise clearly legalizing online gaming.
John McCain:
The New Hampshire Republican primary winner does not have a specific position on Internet poker, but does appear to have been influenced by his fellow Arizona Senator Jon Kyl, who is a vigorous opponent of our rights. McCain, however, has always been willing to consider both sides of an issue and may simply need to know how strongly PPA members feel about this issue.
Ron Paul:
In keeping with his Libertarian philosophy, Congressman Paul is a proud supporter of our cause. Rep. Paul has supported and sponsored pro-poker legislation, and has also made time to visit with PPA grassroots members, poker celebrities, and citizens lobbyists every time we have asked. His credentials on allowing adults the freedom to play poker are unblemished.
Mitt Romney:
The former governor of Massachusetts has no formal position on internet poker. However, he - like Giuliani - has contorted his issue positions wildly in a bid to gain support from social conservatives. As part of that effort, Romney tapped Tom Coates, Vice President, Truth About Gambling, Iowa, to his "Faith and Values Steering Committee." Coates, in turn, is vigorously opposed to gaming of any sort. "
Thomas Jefferson once wrote that, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed..."
And if you read between the lines, Alberto, it says, "Mike Huckabee can kiss my colonial ass."

Poker: bad. Killing a family of migrating birds: Huckabee-licious.





Who cares about poker? What do these idiots think about craps? Other than McCain who we know like to toss the dice, the others are silent on the issue. Pussies.
Reply to this